Q&A with SAT Expert Dr. Gary Gruber

Before many of us were even old enough to take the SAT, Dr. Gary Gruber was already helping students improve their test scores. 30 years later, Dr. Gruber remains one of the foremost authorities on SAT & ACT test preparation, publishing more than 30 test prep books that have sold over 7 million copies.

Dr. Gruber’s test prep books include:

Gruber’s Complete SAT Guide
Gruber’s Complete ACT Guide 2010
Gruber’s SAT 2400
Gruber’s SAT Word Master
Gruber’s Complete SAT Reading Workbook
Gruber’s Complete SAT Writing Workbook
Gruber’s Complete SAT Math Workbook

Dr. Gruber was kind enough to answer a few questions about his long experience in test prep, his thoughts about the new SAT, and his recommendations for tutors and students.

How did you get started in test prep? Do you still personally train students?

When in fifth grade I received a 90IQ (below average) on an IQ Test, my father who was a High School teacher at the time, was concerned so he was able to get me an IQ test hoping I could study it and increase my score. However, when I looked at the test, I was so fascinated at what the questions were trying to assess, I started to figure out what strategies and thinking could have been used for the questions and saw interesting patterns of what the test-maker was trying to test. I increased my IQ to 126 and then to 150. The initial experience of scoring so low on a first IQ test and branded as “dull minded”actually developed my fascination and research with standardized tests and I was determined to afford all other students my knowledge and experience so they would show their true potential as I did. So I constantly write books, newspaper and magazine articles and columns, software, and personally teach students and teachers.

The College Board revamped the SAT in 2005. How has the new SAT changed from the old SAT? Do you think the new SAT is harder or easier than the old SAT?

The College Board had taken out the Analogies and Quantitative Comparisons and had included and Essay section. In the Reading section shorter reading passages and questions relating to “double-reading passages” were added. The new math section was enhanced and added items from third year college preparatory math.

What is the ‘Gruber method’ and how does it differ from other test prep methods?

The unique aspect of my method is that I provide a mechanism and process where the student internalizes the use of strategies and thinking skills and then reinforce those methods so that students can answer questions on the SAT or ACT without panic or brain wracking. This is actually a “fun” process. The Gruber method focuses on the student’s patterns of thinking and how the student should best answer the questions. I have also developed a nationally syndicated test which is the only one of its kind and which actually tracks a student’s thinking approach for the SAT (and ACT) and directs the student to exactly what strategies are necessary for them to learn. Instead of just learning how to solve one problem at a time, if you learn a Gruber strategy you can that problem and thousands of other problems.

How do you ensure that the practice questions in your books are accurate reflections of what students will see on the actual tests?

There are two processes. For the first, I am constantly critically analyzing all the current questions and patterns on the actual tests. The second process is based on the fact that I am in directly in touch with the research development teams for any new items or methods used in the questions on any upcoming test, so I am probably the only one besides the actual SAT or ACT people that knows exactly what is being tested and why it is being tested on the SAT or what will be tested on current and upcoming tests.

What percentage of test prep study time should students spend learning vocabulary words?

The student should not spend too much time on this—perhaps 4 hours at most. The time should be invested in learning the Important Prefixes and Roots I have developed and the 3 Vocabulary Strategies. The student might also want to learn the 291 words and their opposites, which I have developed based on research of 100’s of SAT’s.

What advice can you give to students suffering from test anxiety?

I find when the student learns specific strategies they see how a strategy can be used for a multitude of questions and when they see a question on an actual SAT that uses the strategy it reinforces a confidence in them and reduces the panic. They can also treat the SAT as a game by using my strategic approaches and the panic is also reduced as a result.

SAT vs. ACT: How should students decide which test to take?

The correlation happens to be very high for both tests in that if you score well on one you will score equivalently well on the other. However, the ACT is more memory oriented than the SAT. The material is about the same, for example, there is Grammar on both tests. Math is about the same except the ACT is less strategically oriented. There is Reading on both tests and they test about the same things. However on the ACT there is a whole section on scientific data interpretation (The SAT has some questions on this topic in the Math). Fortunately you don’t have to know the science subject matter on the ACT. If you are more prone to memory, I would take the ACT. If you are more prone to strategizing or you like puzzles, I would take the SAT. In any event, I would check with the Schools that you are applying to and find out which test they prefer.

What is the single most important piece of advice you can give to students taking the SAT or ACT?

Learn some specific strategies which can be found in my books. This will let you think mechanically without wracking your brains. When answering the questions, don’t concentrate or panic about finding the answer. Try to extract something in the question which is curious and/or which will lead you to a next step in the question. You will through this “processing” the question, enable you to get an answer.

What is the single most important piece of advice you can give to tutors teaching the SAT or ACT?

Make sure that you learn the specific strategies and teach students those strategies using many different questions which employ the strategy, so the student will see variations on how that strategy is used.

What recommendations can you give to tutors who want to use your books in their test prep programs?

In Sections VI and VII in the INTRODUCTION to the SAT book there are programs for 4 hours and longer for studying for the SAT. You can use this information to create a program for teaching the student.

In Sections III and IV in the INTRODUCTION to the ACT book there are programs for 4 hours and longer for studying for the ACT. You can use this information to create a program for teaching the student.

Always try to reinforce the strategic approach, where the student can hone and internalize strategies so that they can use them for multitudes of questions.

Thank you Dr. Gruber!

A good SAT stats page

CollegeStats.org has posted what it calls The Ultimate Guide to SAT Test Statistics:

To learn more about SAT scores and percentiles, what they mean, how colleges use them and the support versus criticisms of the test, we’ve prepared a list of links for your convenience. All these links are current, and include some of the latest test scores as well as historic numbers in some links. This list is categorized, and each link is listed alphabetically within those categories.

The page has a good list of links with a lot of interesting information about the SAT. Check it out!

College Board SAT Class of 2009 Report

From the New York Times:

Average SAT scores in reading and writing declined by one point this year, while math scores held steady, according to a report on the high school class of 2009 released Tuesday by the College Board.
…
Average scores on the three sections of the SAT were 501 in critical reading, 493 in writing, and 515 in mathematics. Scores for each section of the test range from 200 to 800.
Average scores last year, for the high school class of 2008, were 502 in reading, 494 in writing, and 515 in math.
…
More than 1.5 million college-bound seniors took the SAT, the largest group that had ever taken the test.

Males continue to outperform females on Math and Critical Reading (slightly), while females outperform males on Writing.

larger here

Ethnic disparities in performance continue:

In critical reading, non-Hispanic white students on average scored 528, compared with 516 for Asian students, 455 for Hispanic ones and 429 for African-Americans. In math, Asian students averaged 587, compared with 536 for non-Hispanic whites, 461 for Hispanics and 426 for blacks. In writing, Asians averaged 520, compared with 517 for non-Hispanic whites, 448 for Hispanics and 421 for blacks.

There also remains a strong correlation between family income and SAT performance:

The average scores for all three sections of the test directly reflected students’ family wealth. Students from families with an annual income above $200,000 scored, on average, 68 points higher in critical reading than students from families earning less than $20,000 per year, with similar disparities for math and writing.

Critics of the SAT typically point to disparities like these to claim that the test favors wealthier white students, and to a certain extent they may be justified.  However, there is also another factor at work here:

An even sharper correlation showed up between students’ average scores and the highest educational attainment of their parents. Students whose parents did not graduate from high school averaged 420 in critical reading, 139 points lower than students whose parents had a graduate degree, who averaged 559.

The correlation between family income and/or race and SAT performance may be in some ways misleading.  It’s not necessarily that students are simply ‘buying’ better scores or that the test is culturally biased against minorities, so much as the parents of better scoring students tend to be better educated themselves, and therefore have developed skill sets that can be passed down to help their children perform more optimally.   Since better educated parents are also more likely to be both wealthy and white, these socio-economic discrepancies are then reflected in the SAT score disparities.

That’s not to say that factors of  race and income do not affect SAT performance, but simply that the relative impact of these factors on student success may be overstated when compared to the impact of parental education.

‘SAT Unlocked’ gets nice video review

Rodney Daut of sat-essay.net has produced a very flattering and informative video review of my SAT Unlocked study guide.

Thanks for the kind words Rodney. I really appreciate it!

Why the SAT is not a great measure of Intelligence

The econblog Marginal Revolution points to an interesting academic study of intelligence (PDF) published by Professors Keith E. Stanovich and Richard F. West.

In 7 different studies, the authors observed that a large number of thinking biases are uncorrelated with cognitive ability. These thinking biases include some of the most classic and well-studied biases in the heuristics and biases literature, including the conjunction effect, framing effects, anchoring effects, outcome bias, base-rate neglect, “less is more” effects, affect biases, omission bias, myside bias, sunk-cost effect, and certainty effects that violate the axioms of expected utility theory. In a further experiment, the authors nonetheless showed that cognitive ability does correlate with the tendency to avoid some rational thinking biases, specifically the tendency to display denominator neglect, probability matching rather than maximizing, belief bias, and matching bias on the 4-card selection task. The authors present a framework for predicting when cognitive ability will and will not correlate with a rational thinking tendency.

Basically, the paper reports on various experiments that purport to determine how ‘cognitive ability’ (i.e., intelligence) affects an individual’s decision making processes.  What caught my attention was the study’s use of SAT scores to determine the cognitive ability of individuals in the test group.

The participants were 434 undergraduate students (102 men and 332 women) recruited through an introductory psychology subject pool at a medium-sized state university in the United States. Their mean age was 19.0 years….

Students were asked to indicate their verbal, mathematical, and total SAT scores on the demographics form. The mean reported verbal SAT score of the students was 577 (SD 68), the mean reported mathematical SAT score was 572 (SD 69), and the mean total SAT score was 1149 (SD 110). The institution-wide averages for this university in 2006 were 565, 575, and 1140, respectively…

The total SAT score was used as an index of cognitive ability in the analyses reported here because it loads highly on psychometric g (Frey & Detterman, 2004; Unsworth & Engle, 2007). For the purposes of some of the analyses described below, the 206 students with SAT scores below the median (1150) were assigned to the low-SAT group, and the 228 remaining students were assigned to the high-SAT group. Parallel analyses that are fully continuous and that did not involve partitioning the sample are also reported.

A serious flaw in this research is the erroneous conflation of student reported SAT scores with cognitive ability. As a professional SAT tutor and educator who has individually taught many hundreds of students to achieve substantially higher scores, I do not believe that SAT performance can or should be considered an appropriate baseline measure of cognitive ability, as this study does.

Simply put, proper SAT training can improve student scores by literally hundreds of points, and while there is indeed a score ceiling that each student usually reaches, unless the study provides statistical control for whether has student has been ‘optimized’ to achieve this ceiling, its reliance on SAT scores as a test of a student’s cognitive ability must be considered fatally flawed.

Moreover, even if a student has not had any training, the College Board’s own study (PDF) shows that simply by taking the test multiple times, a student can improve his or her scores.   Without controlling for how many times a student took the test, let alone whether the student is reporting best scores in individual subjects from the same test or different tests, there is simply no way to say that a student’s final reported SAT score is a legitimate cognitive measure on which to base other experiments of biases.

It should also be noted that many other non-intelligence factors, both internal and external, also affect SAT scores. Parental and peer pressure can have a severe (usually negative) impact on student performance. Mental fatigue (often caused by student overscheduling) and physical fatigue (common among student athletes) are also factors. Likewise, a student’s maturity level (both emotional and physical) is an important variable. There are others.

In sum, the reliance on self reported SAT scores as the definitive indicator of a student’s cognitive ability skews the results of this study to such a significant degree that they must be questioned.  I’m not saying that the conclusions of Profs. Stanovich & West do not have merit; just that without a more accurate and controlled baseline of cognitive ability, there is simply no way to tell.

SAT Tutors: Post Your Info Here!

Use the comment section to post information about your SAT tutoring services. Feel free to include any contact, location, bio or other information clients might want to know about you.

And if you have a website, don’t forget to post a link!

If you are a student or parent looking for an SAT tutor, please contact the tutor you are interested in directly. Remember, it is never wise to post personal information on a public website, and besides, it is unlikely that tutors who advertise here will actually see your post anyway.

Please Note:
This comment thread is reserved for SAT tutors only. All non-tutor posts will be deleted.
Also, please do not ‘jump the thread’ by posting your information as a reply instead of a new comment.